0.00/0.09 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 960 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 120 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 02:11:59 EDT 2022 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime : 0.14/0.39 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.14/0.39 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 7127 completed with status 0 0.14/0.40 # Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied 0.14/0.40 # Search class: HGHNS-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # new_ho_10 with pid 7131 completed with status 0 0.14/0.40 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied 0.14/0.40 # Search class: HGHNS-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.14/0.40 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.14/0.40 0.14/0.40 # Proof found! 0.14/0.40 # SZS status Theorem 0.14/0.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.14/0.40 thf(decl_22, type, cQ: a > a > $o). 0.14/0.40 thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: a > a > $o). 0.14/0.40 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_1: a > a). 0.14/0.40 thf(decl_25, type, esk2_0: a). 0.14/0.40 thf(decl_26, type, esk3_0: a). 0.14/0.40 thf(decl_27, type, esk4_0: a). 0.14/0.40 thf(decl_28, type, esk5_0: a). 0.14/0.40 thf(decl_29, type, esk6_0: a). 0.14/0.40 thf(decl_30, type, esk7_0: a). 0.14/0.40 thf(cTHM559A_pme, conjecture, (?[X1:a > a > $o]:(![X2:a]:(((![X3:a]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X3)=>![X4:a]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X4)<=>(cQ @ X3 @ X4)))))&(X1 @ X2 @ X2))&?[X5:a]:((X1 @ X2 @ X5)))))=>((![X2:a, X4:a]:(((cQ @ X4 @ X2)<=(cQ @ X2 @ X4)))&![X2:a, X4:a, X5:a]:((((cQ @ X4 @ X5)&(cQ @ X2 @ X4))=>(cQ @ X2 @ X5))))&![X2:a]:((cQ @ X2 @ X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM559A_pme)). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((?[X1:a > a > $o]:(![X2:a]:(((![X3:a]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X3)=>![X4:a]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X4)<=>(cQ @ X3 @ X4)))))&(X1 @ X2 @ X2))&?[X5:a]:((X1 @ X2 @ X5)))))=>((![X2:a, X4:a]:(((cQ @ X2 @ X4)=>(cQ @ X4 @ X2)))&![X2:a, X4:a, X5:a]:((((cQ @ X4 @ X5)&(cQ @ X2 @ X4))=>(cQ @ X2 @ X5))))&![X2:a]:((cQ @ X2 @ X2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM559A_pme])])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X18:a, X19:a, X20:a]:((((((~(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X20)|(cQ @ X19 @ X20)|~(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X19))&(~(cQ @ X19 @ X20)|(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X20)|~(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X19)))&(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X18))&(epred1_0 @ X18 @ (esk1_1 @ X18)))&(((((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))&((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0)))&(~(cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0)))&((((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|~(cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))&((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|~(cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0)))&(~(cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0)|~(cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X3:a, X4:a]:(((cQ @ X4 @ X3)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X3:a]:(((cQ @ X2 @ X3)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:((cQ @ X2 @ X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_4])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a, X2:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X3)|~((cQ @ X2 @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk6_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_7])])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|(cQ @ X2 @ esk6_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_11])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk5_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk4_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_12])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0))|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|(cQ @ X2 @ esk6_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk4_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_7])])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_7])])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_4]), c_0_18])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk6_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_19])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_7])])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk3_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk2_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_21])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((cQ @ X2 @ esk6_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_22])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk5_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk4_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_23])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, (~((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0))|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X2:a]:(((cQ @ esk3_0 @ X2)|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_24])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((cQ @ X2 @ esk6_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk4_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_7])])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((cQ @ esk3_0 @ X2)|~((epred1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_4])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_4]), c_0_30])). 0.14/0.40 thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_4]), c_0_32]), ['proof']). 0.14/0.40 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.14/0.40 # Parsed axioms : 3 0.14/0.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.14/0.40 # Initial clauses : 12 0.14/0.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2 0.14/0.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10 0.14/0.40 # Processed clauses : 84 0.14/0.40 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.14/0.40 # ...subsumed : 11 0.14/0.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 73 0.14/0.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.14/0.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.14/0.40 # Backward-subsumed : 12 0.14/0.40 # Backward-rewritten : 18 0.14/0.40 # Generated clauses : 160 0.14/0.40 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 152 0.14/0.40 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.14/0.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2 0.14/0.40 # Paramodulations : 160 0.14/0.40 # Factorizations : 0 0.14/0.40 # NegExts : 0 0.14/0.40 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.14/0.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.14/0.40 # Propositional check models : 0 0.14/0.40 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.14/0.40 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.14/0.40 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.14/0.40 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.14/0.40 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.14/0.40 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.14/0.40 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.14/0.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 33 0.14/0.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5 0.14/0.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.14/0.40 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.14/0.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 27 0.14/0.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40 0.14/0.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 113 0.14/0.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.14/0.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 40 0.14/0.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 536 0.14/0.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 452 0.14/0.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13 0.14/0.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24 0.14/0.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.14/0.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 10 0.14/0.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 2 0.14/0.40 # Condensation attempts : 84 0.14/0.40 # Condensation successes : 0 0.14/0.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3035 0.14/0.40 0.14/0.40 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.14/0.40 # User time : 0.009 s 0.14/0.40 # System time : 0.000 s 0.14/0.40 # Total time : 0.009 s 0.14/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages 0.14/0.40 0.14/0.40 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.14/0.40 # User time : 0.010 s 0.14/0.40 # System time : 0.001 s 0.14/0.40 # Total time : 0.011 s 0.14/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages 0.14/0.40 EOF